Information Guillot Laura's blog in his post: http://lauraguillot.blogspot.com/2011/02/ be-filter-than-the-kind-of-charge-sera.html Regarding bets horse appears to be under the wagering fitración and cross the bounds set by the bookmaker have a 25% levy on net income while betting have a 15% of gross revenues .
Nothing is known about the rate of return requested by the SFCCE although it has leaked that the defendant LFP rate will return, hopefully they are also the races as the filtering Turf will not return and this is serious harm to our sport Why some and not others?, Admas appears that the prayers have not heard about the charge that this law is disproportionate and blocks sector on-line game, no doubt benefiting the state and face operators.
Case Study: Suppose that an operator with on-line betting betting received 6,000 in a career. About
gross:
Rate: 15% of the 6,000 € = 900 € Return
rate to bettors: would have to lie to get benefits in about 70% = € 4,200
Operating profit = 900 €
About the Net Rate
15% of the difference between what is played and distributed = 180 €
Return to bettors (could play a more attractive return of 80%) = 4800 € = operator
Benefit € 1380
With this simple practical example and see it as an excessive burden away from the player and not interested at all to the operator, however a 15% rate on net encourages more play and a greater interest on-line operated at both have more licenses and more game getting the same recuadación played by volume. Who hurts
then the law? Clearly the bettor and the operator, the bettor to the unattractive bet most interesting find another operator with a share better abroad and not being competitive operator will not be interested to have a license online in Spain.
0 comments:
Post a Comment